Artisanal Hypocrisy

I have seen many people out there who are caught up in the mindset of criticism when it comes to grieving celebrities in our lives such as actors, writers, or musicians while we don’t grieve for every soldier who passes.

The irony here is that many of those people who do the criticizing are artists of some sort themselves. They strive for excellence in their lives, they desire to reach out and touch people through their work and/or their art. To be critical of the public mourning of the passing of another artist is the perfect example of hypocrisy.

My question to those people is this: Why should I, or anyone else! -give credence to your art, to your desire to touch the lives of others, when you yourself would exclude and dismiss others who have done so? Those artists are people who we invite into our lives, into our living rooms, and we give them our undivided attention for however long they are there. They touch our lives, even our souls, in ways that most people cannot.

And I would also question: Why are those who spew their condescending and vitriolic criticism so condescending in their attitude to assume that we do not grieve for our fallen defenders of liberty. Who are you to judge that because I mourn the passing of a celebrity, that I don’t mourn our soldiers “correctly” because it doesn’t meet your approval?

A soldier dies a soldier’s death and is mourned as a soldier serves, with a solemn sense of duty and respectful privacy. A celebrity is mourned as a celebrity lives; in public, by the public whose lives that celebrity has touched in a directly personal way.


The Paths to Enlightenment

There is almost always more than meets the eye; or the expectation…

Walking an un-trod or rarely trodden path can be difficult. It can be frustrating and challenging and there are times when you just want to give up. When every single small thing that makes such a journey hard to do sometimes happens all at one time, it is tempting to throw up your hands and just quit.

I haven’t done that yet, though I’ve come close.

My particular journey is an odd one. I have chosen to walk where many others refuse to go. Where there are few of us who remain true our core principles because they are our core principles, not out of desire to fit in. And that can be challenging.

You see, I’m a Libertarian with a conservative bent, and most of the people that I encounter are Christians; fundamentalist Christians, who find it challenging to make and keep good friends outside of their group sometimes. Not all of them, but many.

Me, I’m not a Christian. Not because I haven’t heard the message, but because I have heard it, over and over again. Ad-nauseum. I am also pretty well-educated in the Bible, sociology, human nature and the history that surrounds the time of Jesus, including alternate theories and practices surrounding the formation of Christianity.

My chosen path that I found so challenging is this; I’ve chosen to not just exist in my own bubble, but to challenge my Christian friends to move away from the assumptions they have about people like me and everyone else they encounter, and the assumptions are many.

Unlike many non-Christians, non-practicing Christians, or lapsed Christians, I like my friends and acquaintances and I don’t hold their belief system against them. I don’t think them dimwitted for adhering to their values and what they hold sacred and true. Hey, the Universe is full of the impossible. They could be right.

The initial assumptions I get from Christians that don’t know me, or people like me, are that we are just like them; that we are a God-fearing Christians who are signed on to all or most of the fundamentalist beliefs that they espouse. These assumptions occur because I of my political outlook and groups I associate with.

Please notice that I mentioned ‘beliefs’, but I did not say principles. I hold many of the same principles dear, just not the belief system.

I guess their assumptions are easy ones to make. I don’t preach my own belief system. I bow my head out of respect when prayers are uttered, and I don’t feel the need to say anything at all about my own philosophy on life in the arena of political ideas.

The really interesting things start to happen when my friends realize, initially through a direct encounter and then y word of mouth, that I am not a Christian. That is when the really interesting and often offensive assumptions begin. I don’t take it personally, because like any other established religion, facts and presumptions regarding their doctrine are drilled into their head from the beginning, and accepted by everyone around them as basic fact. That doesn’t make the assumptions they make about me any less offensive, but if I took things personally, I’d never be able to leave my house lest the anger of just existing overwhelm me.

Basic assumptions include things like if you are not a Christian, then you must be an atheist, that you don’t believe in God, or something larger than yourself. That if you are not a Christian that you don’t ‘know’ about Jesus and his teachings, or you don’t even believe that Jesus existed. That you don’t believe in the basic principles that Christians believe, such as the Golden rule or the wisdom of the Ten Commandments. That even if you do know of, or about the teachings of the Bible and specifically of Jesus, that you certainly don’t get it.

It was kind of funny when I started to realize what the assumptions were and how they took form. It has been by far the largest challenge yet. The mindset is almost impenetrable, though I have seen success with the more inquisitive, open minded friends who are strong enough in their faith that they are willing to entertain ideas and concepts outside of their structured world.

The biggest challenge I speak of is the assumption by Christians that if you are not a Christian that you are devoid of any spirituality whatsoever; or that you are so un-evolved spiritually as to not have a spiritual nature at all. If you do not follow Jesus and the tenets laid down by men in the fourth century, then you do not have the capacity to attain spirituality unless you are on the path to accepting Jesus.

Which is kind of ironic because Christians do believe that we all have a soul, and if we don’t accept Jesus that the soul goes to purgatory or hell. So regardless of the path, there is still a spiritual journey being made… It’s an inconsistency I find it hard to reconcile, much less address, so for peace of mind I just write it off to human nature.

For me, this is highly offensive, but it is a solid paradigm among Christians that is all but impossible to change. It is offensive for me because I was raised to see a larger spiritual picture. To recognize the inner quest, the spiritual journey of the human animal and respect it. I was taught that different cultures, indeed, different individuals all have spiritual journeys that they must walk, and that those journeys are to be respected and honored.

Very often, the most spiritual people I have known have been those that walk their own or alternate paths to enlightenment, be it Buddhism, Taoism, the various belief systems of Native Americans, Confucianism, or even the path of science.

And some of the least spiritually evolved people I have ever known are those who attend a regular congregation of whatever religion they espouse. Often it seems they assume that their attendance to worship is what makes them Spiritual, and excuses the many transgressions of their professed belief system.

A more detailed example of the ‘spirituality void’ concept is found in a conversation I had recently with a very devout friend who preaches the message of love, kindness, acceptance, and generosity of spirit. I made the error of holding my own assumptions about how he would recognize spirituality in others, but when I broached the subject with him about his message to non-Christians, I got a surprise.

His inherent assumption based on his response to me was; that if a person professes to be spiritual, that they are on the path to recognizing the Christian faith as the one, true path. He kind of berated his fellow Christians in his answer to me. He said that they need to love those types of people as all others; that they cannot shove their beliefs down the throats of the budding masses of spirituality, saying “You don’t feed a baby steak right away! A baby needs to be nurtured with milk at first and work their way up to more solid foods along the way.”

Do you see the assumption inherent in this diatribe? That steak is the rich teachings of Christianity; that rich solid foods are the meat, so to speak, of spirituality; which is, to him, Christianity.

Even if he did not intend to say it that way or if that’s not what he really meant, one of the drawbacks that Christians encounter in conversation with non-Christians is that what they say and how they say it is almost always perceived as ‘talking down’ to non-Christians; very often because of these very attitudes and assumptions that they unconsciously convey in their encounters with non-Christians. And as they say, folks, ‘Perception is Reality’.

I’ve had plenty of steak. I’ve moved beyond steak to many more tastes and culinary adventures. The richness of the foods I have sampled put steak to shame in many cases. But the assumption that I was only at the ‘milk’ level of ability to consume spiritual ideas and concepts- even of a specific religion- was, and is, kind of offensive. Actually, it’s very offensive. I’m a grown man with an advanced intellect. I have taught Christians true history about their own background they never knew, or suspected even existed.

But still I remain calm and vigilant. For all of the offense it gives, most Christians I know are not intent on being offensive. They truly believe they are being kind and helpful, that they are shining a light on a path that has done wonders and miracles for them in their lives, and out of love they want the same for you. And it might very well be that the path they shine the light on could be that kind of path for many people.

The trouble is that they have is an issue recognizing and respecting when that is not the case with given individuals, and very often they have a hard time wrapping their heads around that concept.

So it is up to us, those who are not quite so wrapped up in a closed system of thinking, to bridge the gap if we want to be able to actually have a civil, useful dialogue regarding the world around us today and how to solve the many problems with which we are faced. We need to step out of the closet of alternate belief and challenge our friends and colleagues to be the inclusive group they profess to be. Challenge them to respect us, and respect the principles that founded this nation; the right to believe and worship as we see fit without outside interference or judgment.

Christians are not bad people. They are not hateful people. They are not stupid or closed-minded people. They are, for the most part, good people who can sometimes find themselves in a bit of a fog with regards to the assumptions they make and the interactions they engage in.

News Flash: As humans, we are all like that to a certain extent.

How about we cut each other a break?

The Passage From Living Legend to ‘Legend’

Live Long and Prosper, Spock. Rest in Peace, Leonard.

I’m hardly alone in my sadness today that Leonard Nimoy has transitioned from ‘Living Legend’ to simply ‘Legend’.

It’s fascinating to look back and consider the impact that Leonard Nimoy had, and has, as Spock on our culture. Even those who never watched Star Trek, The Original Series know exactly who Spock is. The icon he became echoes down so clearly in our culture that even the youngest among us know of ‘Spock’, even if they don’t know the difference between ‘VHF’ and ‘UHF’ when it comes to TV’s, or if they can’t remember ever seeing a turntable, or hearing a phone actually ‘ring’.

What many do not know is that Leonard Nimoy, despite the iron grip with which Roddenberry controlled the series early on, had on the development of the character of Spock himself. He was instrumental in bringing Spock to life for us in a way that so few have ever been able to do. To me, it was the actors and characters such as Spock that made the series what it was. The actors took a concept and ran with it; maybe no one faster and better than Leonard Nimoy.

So very many people took inspiration from ‘Spock’ the character, and from Leonard himself, as well. As the years passed, it was always gratifying to see Leonard Nimoy pop up again here and there, and it was always amazing to see the balance that Nimoy was able to strike between being willing to lampoon his character a little and yet maintain the dignity and integrity of Spock.

When you see out-takes and pictures of Nimoy himself as a laughing, engaged, fun loving human, it can be disconcerting to try and reconcile that image he projected as Spock, which to me speaks to his ability as an actor, that he was able to pull off such in incredibly believable portrayal.

His death, to me, doesn’t fall under the trope that so many might get upset about when it comes to ‘celebrity deaths’; and that is because Leonard Nimoy has been part of the family for my entire life. He came into my living room every night when I was young, and seeing him again in the latest incarnation of his character always made me feel like I was seeing a long lost friend. He helped shape some of my outlook on life. I learned from Nimoy, and from Spock.

He will be sorely missed. I know his death has touched me today, and I will fondly remember him for the rest of my life. I’m gratified that he was able to say good-bye to us, in a way. His final tweet was; ‘A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory.  LLAP’

Live Long and Prosper, Spock. Rest in Peace, Leonard.